Which of the following is most hilarious: chiroquackter, homeoquack or quackupun!
Question: the third one
if i really had to pick one that was genuinly funny...
xxx
Answers: the third one
if i really had to pick one that was genuinly funny...
xxx
The middle one.
How about "Jack the Quack"?
Drug pusher - AKA medical doctor.
In today's news: 540,000 American children suffer from HARMFUL drug-related events (while hospitalized) each year! God knows how many children, who are aren't hospitalized, are harmed by medically prescribed drugs every year!
"Have a nice day."
2nd
defo
x
hard to pick the funniest one 'cause they all quack me up!!!
Why is it with the bueaty of free speach so many misuse it? None of this is funny and it is obvious you are in the wrong section!If all of these practices are not to your likeing why not find some that are where you could contribute you expertise ?
Why are you always on here downing people?
This is not an educated question.
If you read books and articles, journals and publications, and have ever tried any of these complementary and alternative medicines, you would see that your question (and answers would be different).
I can only vouch for the below from personal experience of having an illness since 8yrs old which was not helped till age of 26 yrs old -and believe me when I have said, I tried almost everything within reach!
Acupuncture and Traditional Chinese Medicine is between 5,000 to 8,000 years old and is used as primary health care system in China, along with allopathic medicine (western medicine--Medical doc's). Eastern countries practice different types of medicine and have used these forms (mostly herbal, natural, etc) for thousands of years very successfully treating the common cold to cancers.
Jack the Mack is the funniest. The others at least do something to help the world.
If you dont believe in alternative health why bother coming on here? have a read of the magazine What the doctors dont Tell you. You might get a bit of a surprise.
Only narrow minded, shallow people cant accept that different therapies work for different people, educate yourself, there's so much information out there, dont limit yourself so much, there's no reason to be ignorant in this day and age.
none of them humor me in the slightest ?
are these the only three forms of alternative therapy that you are either afraid of or don't understand??............. or are there others.............. don't be bitter and narrow minded buddy, live and let live hun ?
CHEERS
?
They are all not bad. However I have always hoped, forlornly so far, that they could be debunked using scientific logic. Larger and larger trials have been carried out that show that acupuncture is no better a placebo than random needle insertion and that homeopathy does not works at all, again beyond the powerful placebo effect.
I did however see a fairly good science based study that compared chiropracty, osteopathy and physiotherapy for back pain and they all came out about the same. Though I suspect this is more demonstrating that none of them work for back pain, rather than all them do!
I also wonder why you seem to be on this site debunking people all the time.
In 100 years we will probably look at allopathic medicine and laugh at some of the treatments and procedures available today. We will probably still use others.
Dr. Frank, when you have met patients who have suffered musculoskeletal pain for several years and their condition subsequently improves from your intervention I think you would agree that manual therapy is effective.
It doesn't in every patient but it certainly does in most of them.
Of course anecdote isn't good enough and has no validity what-so-ever so I can't just ask you to take my word for it as the assumption is that I am either severely deluded or pathologically dishonest.....
I hope you will be inviting all medical students to question their professors who advise them to execute procedures in a particular way because they have found this non standard approach to be effective?
Of course each and every one of them should ask for RCT's proving that what the professors are telling them is effective and correct.
We can't accept anecdote afterall......
Hard call, Homeoquackery, I would say, it was thoroughly debunked over a hundred years ago, and has been on a regular basis ever since, yet remains a major industry. Actually, that's no so funny!