Does Being Circumsized Have Any advantage??!
Question: none other than hygiene purposes thats why they do it, suppsoedly to help against viruses but why fix something when it aint broke
Answers: none other than hygiene purposes thats why they do it, suppsoedly to help against viruses but why fix something when it aint broke
I've lived life both ways; got cut as an adult. There's no REAL advantage to being cut except that I don't have to wash 'under there' anymore. And I love the friction it creates in sex. Other than that, there's no advantages that I can see.
Being circumsized is more hygenic but not being circumsized leaves room for having more pleasure. And as far as AIDS or STD's go your chances are the same and really matter more on if your safe or not.
As a female, I find circumsized penises much more attractive than uncircumsized ones...
There's absolutely no advantage to being circumcised. It's a barbaric form of genital mutilation that, for reasons that escape me, have become considered the 'norm' in the USA. Circumcision is only prevalent here in the US. Everywhere else in the world a circumcised penis is abnormal to see.
You are NOT more likely to catch STDs, that's a fallacy. You're not dirtier or any other asinine preconception that people will tell you about uncut penises.
In fact you loose a huge percentage of your nerve endings from your penis when you get circumcised and less nerves means less sensation so sex is not as intense feeling.
There's absolutely no good reason to get a circumcision. I wish that parents here in the US would stop mutilating their sons penises. And anyone (man or woman) who won't have sex with you because it "looks wierd" or whatever is ignorant and needs to learn that is how a human male penis is supposed to look.
every girl...at least where i live....prefers a circumsized penis....me included.
Everything has advantages and disadvantages. The only advantage I can see of it is that it saves you 5 seconds in the shower as you don't have to pull the foreskin down to wash. Apart from that, being uncircumsized is perfectly natural, worldwide is the norm (85% of all men are not circumsized), the foreskin protects the helmet of the penis keeping it senstitive and soft, and its fun to play with during foreplay and makes masturbation easier (no need for lube). That's why I much prefer being uncircumsized!
well I prefer a circumsized penis, looks better. But with foreskin there are good parts and bad parts, the bad part will be that some guys dont clean it well under there, therefore leaving bacteria, that when that guy has sex, it could spread to the girl, which could give her a yeast infection, or stds, if that person got stds or whatever. But the good part is that ur more sensitive, to the pleasure. So its ur choice whether u want to lose the feeling to pleasure, dont get me wrong, u can still get great sex, but it will different than before. So its up to u, either its personal hygiene, or pleasure, or both. Well Good Luck! With that choice! Thank god I'm a girl! Who's a virgin 4 ur info. TMI! :P (lol)
It's cleaner, looks better and chicks dig it!
The "advantages" are all mythical. It's NOT more hygienic (you have to wash anyway), and it DOESN'T prevent the spread of stds. What it does is make the sexual experience less enjoyable for both men and women. If you are opposed to sex being pleasurable, then circumcision is just the ticket. Otherwise intact men have all the advantages, including being protected from an extremely tiny minority of really shallow females who care more about what a penis looks like than how well it works.
Actually being circumcised prevents adhesion's due to uncleanliness, which can happen alot in the elderly infirm. And the latest research shows that circumcision does lower the chances of contracting the AIDS virus because there is no foreskin for the virus to hide under eventually making its way into the body via the urethra.
It is a lot cleaner. Many pairents get it done for kids for that exact reason.
Everything has advantages if you really think about it.
I'm against infant circumcision. By leaving a boy uncircumcised, if he's not satisfied with it he can always get cut and end up satisfied in the end. One survey found that about half of circumcised guys would have preferred to had made the decision themselves:
http://www.jackinworld.com/qow/q15.html
Circumcision has become less common. Circumcision rates were as high as 90% back in the 1960s and 1970s (that's partly why today's adults are so... brainwashed, I supposed you could say, about thinking that circumcision is better) but they have fallen to as low as 14% in some states. Here are the statistics:
http://www.cirp.org/library/statistics/U...
The USA is the last developed nation doing it to a large number of newborns without religious or medical needs. (Europeans, Latin Americans, Japanese, and most Australians, Canadians, and Asians don't circumcise):
http://www.circumstitions.com/Maps.html
Christianity doesn't ask for circumcision, either. In fact, sections of the Bible are harsh against circumcision, and the Catholic Church even condemned the surgery:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcisio...
In a medical study, it was found that females are more likely to hit orgasm with an uncircumcised man:
http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/...
The lubricated foreskin (on the inside... like your eyelids) slides up and down during sex and masturbation to stimulate the head (which is why you don't hear of uncircumcised guys needing lube to masturbate).
http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/
Studies have found that circumcision reduces sensitivity (this article also mentions how it has lost popularity in the USA in recent times):
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,2855...
And despite being more sensitive, uncircumcised guys still last in the same six minute range (average) that circumcised guys do:
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs...
Circumcision makes masturbation more difficult:
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs...
Which makes sense, that's how circumcision was promoted in the USA:
http://english.pravda.ru/science/health/...
Increases erectile dysfunction rates:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez...
If too much skin is removed in circumcision, it can make the penis smaller since the penis needs some skin to expand during an erection:
http://drgreene.org/body.cfm?id=21&actio...
http://www.altermd.com/Penis%20and%20Scr...
There's pain involved, often why doctors don't want you in the room when it's done:
http://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/9712/23/circum...
http://www.pslgroup.com/dg/1f21e.htm
(you can search online for a circumcision video, too)
Circumcision does not completely stop penile cancer. The American Cancer Society has already confirmed the myth that circumcision = no cancer.
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/conten...
If circumcision did stop penile cancer, then penile cancer would not be more common in the USA (most circumcised adults) than in some European nations, where circumcision is not practiced other than for medical/religious reasons.
http://www.circumstitions.com/Cancer.htm...
And a new study found that circumcision does not reduce your chances to get HIV/AIDS. Unlike other studies, this one was done in a developed nation; the USA.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22096758/
Of course, there are other risks associated, but those are typically the ones due to surgery. You can research it more here:
http://shorl.com/deprygyfrykiny
http://www.mothering.com/articles/new_ba...
PS. As far as cleaning goes, it's really simple. For the first years in life the foreskin doesn't pull back. That prevents stuff like poo/fecal matter from touching the head. Later on all it takes it 5 to 10 seconds to pull the foreskin back and rub the head; it even feels good.
http://www.mothering.com/articles/new_ba...