Which is worse getting a knee or a kick into the balls.?!
Question: I always had a feeling it was a knee,i just never had the pleasure ha ha.
Answers: I always had a feeling it was a knee,i just never had the pleasure ha ha.
If someone uses their knee then they're using the full force of their thigh muscles in a direct upwards motion. Also got to carry the lower leg, but no energy required in that area.
If they use the lower leg to kick then the thigh muscles have to actually lift the leg into a straighter position, plus they have to counteract the gravity acting on the now extended lower leg which means they've got a lot less energy to propell the leg upwards to the impact zone.
Plus a knee can be adjusted quickly for maximum impact, whereas moving your leg into position midflight is a bit like moving a supertanker - requires more time and thus is likely not to land directly on target, eg: might partly hit their leg.
So in initial conclusion the physics suggests that a knee in the nuts is much more painful than use of the lower leg.
Just to slightly confuse things, there is also the factor of area and force distribution which would favour the lower leg since the impact area is smaller and force distribution would be more concentated due to the proximity of the bone to the surface vs muscle around the knee absorbing some impact force.
However taking this into account, the committee still conclude that the knee would have a greater and thus more painful impact than a kick.
Well, you did ask... :)
PS: We have just noted that the intertia wasn't added to the above conclusions which could in theory counteract much of the lack of force created by the lower leg kick. Therefore the new conclusion is that this might be safer esepcially as you'd be further away and thus less likely to get punched. :-)
about the same id say
im sure it would be a kick.
anything in the balls is too much
Depends on how angry the person is!
erm....hold on il find out for ya...........Now where is my fiance gone, lol
Kick, especially if its a toe poke.
I'd say a kick you can get more leverage to get more force behind it !! :)
geting kicked in the balls man are you crazy it hurts like a mother ******
I would say a kick if its from a women with pointy shoes!!
kick especially a sky upper cut
kick! with a knee ya little friend takes some of the shock, if its an upper cut kick...i hope ya dont want kids!
they both hurt but a kick is way worth
It really does not matter what impliment is used to cause the damage. the point is how hard the blow is. In addition to extreme pain, the result can be destruction of the testes and the boy may never have children.
this is not such a joke, rather it can result in serious and permanent damage.
kick definetly theres more follow threw with it
OUCH!!
either way,they both suck..
you cant really determine which is worse..
at all depends on how much force is behind it.
ive had both,and believe you me both brought me to my knees,with eyes streaming like id been peeling onions all day?????
the difference.......NONE,both blumming painfull.
who knows most guys don't really remember right after that painfule moment it is almost like you black out jk
not the knee or kicked a baseball
They are a FRAGILE area!
And i think there aint much of a differance but i wouldnt like either!
but you dont get many threats of ==>
IM GONNA KNEE YOU IN THE BALL'S!
Neither hurts. It's the most fun Christmas Jimbo has had.
Oh! sorry I thought you said lick!
would not know. depends on the force of the kick size of the foot height of the person recieving height of the person delivering, same thing goes with the knee. why don't you experiment with it and let me know