Do most parents get their children circumcised? Is it bad to be?!
Question: Do most parents get their children circumcised!? Is it bad to be!?
Answers:
No, nowadays the practice is decreasing; most people are coming to realize that natural and normal is better than mutilated and deformed!. In the US 80% of males were subjected to male genital mutilation just a few years ago!.
The rate has dropped to something like 50% and is declining!.
Circumcision destroys at least 50% of sexual sensitivity and frequently more!. Sensitivity continues to decline after the mutilation as the tissues meant to be kept protected and moist by the foreskin dry out and rub against clothing, becoming more and more keratinized over time!.
Orgasms for the circumcised male are less intense, and those who've suffered circumcision as an infant generally have a slightly smaller penis!. Circumcision in infants interrupts the blood supply and nerve tissue, and the general trauma to the penis inhibits normal penile growth and development!.
Is it bad to be circumcised!? Yes, it was for me!. I lost most of my sensitivity and orgasms were impossible with normal sex!. I'm restoring my foreskin, using a device with a stretching technique that causes new cell growth!. Sensitivity and orgasmic intensity have increased dramatically!.
Circumcision is unnatural
Infant circumcision is infant sexual abuse and a violation of the basic human right to a whole and intact body!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
The rate has dropped to something like 50% and is declining!.
Circumcision destroys at least 50% of sexual sensitivity and frequently more!. Sensitivity continues to decline after the mutilation as the tissues meant to be kept protected and moist by the foreskin dry out and rub against clothing, becoming more and more keratinized over time!.
Orgasms for the circumcised male are less intense, and those who've suffered circumcision as an infant generally have a slightly smaller penis!. Circumcision in infants interrupts the blood supply and nerve tissue, and the general trauma to the penis inhibits normal penile growth and development!.
Is it bad to be circumcised!? Yes, it was for me!. I lost most of my sensitivity and orgasms were impossible with normal sex!. I'm restoring my foreskin, using a device with a stretching technique that causes new cell growth!. Sensitivity and orgasmic intensity have increased dramatically!.
Circumcision is unnatural
Infant circumcision is infant sexual abuse and a violation of the basic human right to a whole and intact body!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
It depends where you live!. Worldwide the circumcision rate is 15-20%!.
I take it you are form the USA!. In 1860, 0!.001% of North America was circumcised, presently about 55% are!.
The reason for the increase is because they thought it was a cure for the "sinful" habit of masturbation!. This was a time when anything to do with sex was seen as disgusting!. Here is a video: http://youtube!.com/watch!?v=X09jPPeogLQ
Is it bad to be, you ask!? Well I would say it is preferable to be natural - just because of what is lost in circumcision!. The main things are:
1) The gliding effect!. In a normal penis the skin moves up and down in a gliding motion like it was designed to do!. In a circumcised man there is no skin to masturbate with so they tend to just rub the head!. Often they need special lubrication!.
2) Thousands of specialised pleasure nerves are contained within the foreskin!. These are cut off when you are circumcised!. This dramatically reduces sensation!. Also the glans is now on the outside!. Overtime due to rubbing extra skin forms as protection!. This is called keratinization!. This further reduces sensation!.
There are other things too that are lost: http://www!.norm-uk!.org/circumcision_lost!.!.!.
There are no health benefits to circumcision either!. The American Academy of Paediactrics does not advocate it for that reason!.
It is often cited that you are more likely to get a urinary tract infection if you are left intact, but this is not true!. There are so many confounding variables in the studies done that the data is unreliable!. The studies show that ~2 in a 1000 cut boys get a uti, compared with ~7 in a 1000 uncut!. So, this is very rare and can be prevented by breastfeeding!. Once infected it is treated with antibiotics!. It is not a serious illness, is very rare and so it is no reason to circumcise!.
Abed K, I fear for your patients!. Penile cancer is not prevented through circumcision!. The American Cancer Society says so:
http://www!.cancer!.org/docroot/CRI/conten!.!.!.
Also, the chances of getting penile cancer are 1 in a 100,000:
http://www!.cirp!.org/library/disease/canc!.!.!.
There is a 1 in 500 risk of serious complications from circumcision!.
Still think it is a good idea to circumcise!?Www@Answer-Health@Com
I take it you are form the USA!. In 1860, 0!.001% of North America was circumcised, presently about 55% are!.
The reason for the increase is because they thought it was a cure for the "sinful" habit of masturbation!. This was a time when anything to do with sex was seen as disgusting!. Here is a video: http://youtube!.com/watch!?v=X09jPPeogLQ
Is it bad to be, you ask!? Well I would say it is preferable to be natural - just because of what is lost in circumcision!. The main things are:
1) The gliding effect!. In a normal penis the skin moves up and down in a gliding motion like it was designed to do!. In a circumcised man there is no skin to masturbate with so they tend to just rub the head!. Often they need special lubrication!.
2) Thousands of specialised pleasure nerves are contained within the foreskin!. These are cut off when you are circumcised!. This dramatically reduces sensation!. Also the glans is now on the outside!. Overtime due to rubbing extra skin forms as protection!. This is called keratinization!. This further reduces sensation!.
There are other things too that are lost: http://www!.norm-uk!.org/circumcision_lost!.!.!.
There are no health benefits to circumcision either!. The American Academy of Paediactrics does not advocate it for that reason!.
It is often cited that you are more likely to get a urinary tract infection if you are left intact, but this is not true!. There are so many confounding variables in the studies done that the data is unreliable!. The studies show that ~2 in a 1000 cut boys get a uti, compared with ~7 in a 1000 uncut!. So, this is very rare and can be prevented by breastfeeding!. Once infected it is treated with antibiotics!. It is not a serious illness, is very rare and so it is no reason to circumcise!.
Abed K, I fear for your patients!. Penile cancer is not prevented through circumcision!. The American Cancer Society says so:
http://www!.cancer!.org/docroot/CRI/conten!.!.!.
Also, the chances of getting penile cancer are 1 in a 100,000:
http://www!.cirp!.org/library/disease/canc!.!.!.
There is a 1 in 500 risk of serious complications from circumcision!.
Still think it is a good idea to circumcise!?Www@Answer-Health@Com
it's not bad to be left intact!. the whole foreskin increases chances of catching std's is an invalid report!. the benefits apply if you do not want to wash yourself!. as long as you clean yourself regularly, which i mean of course you'll want to do, you'll be fine!. there are no medical benefits!. it's all opinion!.
abed k: why not remove the appendix, spleen, tonsils at birth!. i mean they may cause problems some day!. that theory is completely biased and totally ridiculous!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
abed k: why not remove the appendix, spleen, tonsils at birth!. i mean they may cause problems some day!. that theory is completely biased and totally ridiculous!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
There are many dudes out there that are not circed and are leading active and healthy lives!. there is no real reason to have a dude circumsized and as far as the dude above Abed K saying " As a whole it is always better to remove things that can be a problem to one's health in the future!." if this is true then we need to cut off breasts to prevent breast cancer, or testicals to prevent testicular cancer, and as soon as the kid comes out take out his appendix cause it is gong to burst anyway!. too funny and he is a third year med student!.
curtdudeWww@Answer-Health@Com
curtdudeWww@Answer-Health@Com
The US is the only modern contry that actually does it anymore!. Only 15% of men in the world are circumcised!. Parents usually just get their child circumcised if the father is because the father wants his son to be like him, pretty weird!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
In the USA nowadays, 50% get their son circumcised, 50% don't!.
Of course its not bad not to be circumcised!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
Of course its not bad not to be circumcised!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
yes most parents 90%of whites are but with everybody 60% because most hispanics are uncircumised no it is not bade to be uncircumised it is oy bad if you have poor hygine and it is better if he gets it when he is bournWww@Answer-Health@Com