Which is more popular?!

Since some 85% of men on the planet have a natural penis, it follows that the vast majority of women are perfectly happy with a complete man.

It's only really in the USA where any woman would find circumcised men common, so this only really apples to there.

I don't suppose that many women do care, although I have heard of women complaining that a circumcised penis is rough during sex, partly because the lack of foreskin affects how the penis glides within the vagina, and partly because loss of sensitivity means that circumcised men have to thrust harder to achieve satisfaction themselves.

I find the word 'uncircumcised' deeply offensive. A foreskin is not something that needs to be removed. How would you like it if I called you 'unamputated', 'undeafened' or 'unblinded'. Would you call a woman 'uncircumcised'? I doubt it. 'Uncircumcised' is the genital equivalent of calling a black person the 'N' word. We are not 'uncircumcised'. We are intact, natural, normal. In the case of circumcision, it's those with the mutilation who are abnormal - it's they who are un-intact.

Women who are educated about the form and function of the penis prefer intact men because they know the damage that circumcision does and the damage a circumcised penis can do to the woman's body.

Women in places where circumcision is common, and who are uneducated about the penis sometimes prefer a circumcised penis because such a mutilation is considered 'normal' in such sick cultures, and because women in such depraved cultures are unaware of the health problems they might suffer due to having sex with a guy who is not fully endowed.

Which is more popular depends on where you are, whether circumcision is common there, and how well-educated women are in that area. In general, worldwide, women prefer an undamaged (intact) penis.

Ive heard girls dont really care, as long as the guy knows how to use it...

Most women don't care.

-Connor