Is second hand smoke worse than first hand smoke???!
Question: That's what researchers say, but I have a hard time believing this. I think the person who directly inhales it would be affected much worse than a second hand smoker would be. Think about it, if someone smokes weed, they can tell through drug tests. However, if you have just been around someone while they were smoking weed, the tests will show that there is not enough of the chemical in your system to prove you were the one actually smoking. That speaks volumes to me.
Answers: That's what researchers say, but I have a hard time believing this. I think the person who directly inhales it would be affected much worse than a second hand smoker would be. Think about it, if someone smokes weed, they can tell through drug tests. However, if you have just been around someone while they were smoking weed, the tests will show that there is not enough of the chemical in your system to prove you were the one actually smoking. That speaks volumes to me.
It is in that you are not a smoker and someone is killing you with their habit.
no, firsthand smoke is the worst because you are directly inhaling the smoke yuck!
Yes.. It is..
NO
let's get all this straight there are roughly three types of cigarette smoke
1. First hand smoke--i.e. smoking the thing not the worst kind the smoke gets filtered by the tobacco, and the filter
2. Second hand smoke-- smoke gets filtered by the tobacco, the filter,your lungs on the waydown, and then again on the way back up
3.Side stream smoke--THIS IS TE WORST OF THE THREE this is the smoke that comes off the end of the ciggarette. It is unfiltered by anything and therfore contains the mostchemicals and other harmful byproducts
I know all of this because i am a proud smoker and paid attention in health class