If I don't want kids, would catching chlamydia be a good way to self-sterili!
Question: I don't have insurance, so a regular sterilization is out of the question.
Answers: I don't have insurance, so a regular sterilization is out of the question.
i respect your decision not to have kids but catching chlamydia harming your own body and giving yourself to tons of people to contract the disease is not such a good idea why dont you just try birth control, condoms, and safer sex practices please do not try & contract a disease it could harm you very much so!
well, its a GREAT way to keep men from wanting sex, thats for darned sure!!
Yeah that might work...if you want it to burn like fire every time you take a pee and give it to every person you have sex with.
No, that is such a stupid idea. I cannot believe how dense some people are.
No DUH!!!! Use protection until you can get your tubes tied.
That is insane, and you know it. You would have to leave chlamydia untreated for it to get to the severity to sterilize you, and then it might not sterilize you but could cause scarring, which could cause you to have dangerous complications if you were to get pregnant. Untreated chlamydia can also lead to death in some cases, I guess if you died then you for sure wouldn't be having any children. If you are really this stupid, then you not having children would only be a good thing. If you must have sex then go to a clinic and get some free condoms.
yeah go catch yourself an std so you don't ever never get Pregnant... you are a Moron....
I don't think so at all. Especially since your partner (being male) would experience discharge and pain in the lower abdomen. Its not a guaranteed way to remain sterile either, you could just pass on a more serious disease to a child. It is so harmful I would not reccomend it at all.
http://www.4woman.gov/faq/stdchlam.htm?s...
oh yeah thats a great idea, catch something you cant cure w/o medicine, which you wouldnt be able to get cause you dont have insurance....your not the brightest crayon in the box are you? maybe you should think abstinence because its obvious your not mature or responsible enough to be having sex... when you have sex you have to be ready for the "consequences" so to speek. at this point condoms are even a good thing to think about for you
I think that catching Chlamydia could do more damage to you than just sterilizing you so that you don't have children. You should rely on birth control and condoms. This is a ridiculous question. Why would anyone want to catch an STD that can cause serious infection that can sometimes require hospitalization and antibiotics given intravenously. I don't think that would be inexpensive, do you? I think it would be less expensive to have the tubal ligation. If you are young, you may change your mind when you get older, but right now you need to grow up a lot and learn more about STDs and safe sex.
stupid idea...
What about going to the free clinic and getting birth control for free?
and.....
What about using condoms?
You may just catch AIDS instead.
If you caught chlamydia, and had sex, you would pass it on.
You could put your life in danger.
What if you changed you mind and decided to have kids?
Use condoms and birth control, or abstinence.
That would be a really stupid way to be sterilized.
You are a moron. Just use a condom. Stupid.
wowwww i think stiching it closed might actually be smarter.... and thats saying a lot.... ridiculous question = ridiculous answer
have a good night...
(and remember to sterilize the needle, a sterilized needle is a sterilized girl!)