Does anybody know a better way to check your blood sugar without puncturing your!
Question: Does anybody know a better way to check your blood sugar without puncturing your figure!?
My mother-in-law is diabetic!. And she is getting tired of using the needles to draw blood every time she wants to check her blood sugar!. She was told that their is a monitor that works without drawing blood!. DOES ANY ONE NOW ABOUT THIS METER!?!?!?!?
Thank you for the feedback!.!.!.!.!.!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
Thank you for the feedback!.!.!.!.!.!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
Answers:
I wore one of those subcutaneous glucose monitors for a study once!. I would not want that to be a permanent fixture as it was pretty fussy!. Also, there was a lag time between what it was measuring and what you were feeling right then and there!.
I remember hearing that they were trying to come up with a painless glucose monitor that used light to scan the veins visible in your wrist!. I don't know if that ever got produced but if so, you can bet it's prohibitively expensive!.
Lastly, they've been advertising Freestyle monitors on television!. The way these work is that they measure blood glucose that can be taken from other parts of the body - hopefully somewhere that hurts less than the tips of your fingers, which have a lot of nerve endings!. http://www!.americandiabetes!.com/Alternat!.!.!.
I'd save up for the wrist one!. My fingers could use a break!Www@Answer-Health@Com
I remember hearing that they were trying to come up with a painless glucose monitor that used light to scan the veins visible in your wrist!. I don't know if that ever got produced but if so, you can bet it's prohibitively expensive!.
Lastly, they've been advertising Freestyle monitors on television!. The way these work is that they measure blood glucose that can be taken from other parts of the body - hopefully somewhere that hurts less than the tips of your fingers, which have a lot of nerve endings!. http://www!.americandiabetes!.com/Alternat!.!.!.
I'd save up for the wrist one!. My fingers could use a break!Www@Answer-Health@Com
There is one but cost around $4000 a year!. Very expensive!
A continuous blood glucose monitor (CGM) determines blood glucose levels on a continuous basis (every few minutes)!. A typical system consists of:
a disposable glucose sensor placed just under the skin, which is worn for a few days until replacement
a link from the sensor to a non-implanted transmitter which communicates to a radio receiver
an electronic receiver worn like a pager (or insulin pump) that displays blood glucose levels on a practically continuous manner, as well as monitors rising and falling trends in glycemic excursions
Continuous blood glucose monitors measure the glucose level of interstitial fluid!. Shortcomings of CGM systems due to this fact are:
continuous systems must be calibrated with a traditional blood glucose measurement (using current technology) and therefore require both the CGM system and occasional "fingerstick"
glucose levels in interstitial fluid lag temporally behind blood glucose values
Patients therefore require traditional fingerstick measurements for calibration (typically twice per day) and are often advised to use fingerstick measurements to confirm hypo- or hyperglycemia before taking corrective action!.
Www@Answer-Health@Com
A continuous blood glucose monitor (CGM) determines blood glucose levels on a continuous basis (every few minutes)!. A typical system consists of:
a disposable glucose sensor placed just under the skin, which is worn for a few days until replacement
a link from the sensor to a non-implanted transmitter which communicates to a radio receiver
an electronic receiver worn like a pager (or insulin pump) that displays blood glucose levels on a practically continuous manner, as well as monitors rising and falling trends in glycemic excursions
Continuous blood glucose monitors measure the glucose level of interstitial fluid!. Shortcomings of CGM systems due to this fact are:
continuous systems must be calibrated with a traditional blood glucose measurement (using current technology) and therefore require both the CGM system and occasional "fingerstick"
glucose levels in interstitial fluid lag temporally behind blood glucose values
Patients therefore require traditional fingerstick measurements for calibration (typically twice per day) and are often advised to use fingerstick measurements to confirm hypo- or hyperglycemia before taking corrective action!.
Www@Answer-Health@Com
The discomfort and inconvenience of finger pricking is one reason people with diabetes don't check their blood sugar as often as they should!.
Moreover, continuous blood sugar monitoring ideally would be better than checking blood sugar only at intervals!. And such monitors could be hooked up to insulin pumps to ensure people get insulin when they need it, 24 hours a day!. But current devices use a thin needle inserted beneath the skin!.
Several companies are competing to bring patients blood sugar monitors that all but eliminate blood letting!. One is the GlucoLight Corp!. Another is OrSense Ltd!. Both reported progress at the American Diabetes Association's 67th Annual Scientific Sessions, held June 22-26 in Chicago!.
The two companies' devices are very different!. The OrSense device uses a finger cuff that periodically restricts blood flow -- much like a blood pressure test -- and then uses a sensor to detect blood-specific signals from infrared light transmitted through the finger!.
A bulky version is already approved for sale in Europe!. And a new model would strap to the wrist like a large watch, with a small wire connecting it to a ring on the index finger!.
The GlucoLight uses a sensor to scan the skin using infrared light!. The sensor is attached to a monitor that, in the current version, is too big to carry around!. It's currently being tested in intensive care wards, where constant blood sugar monitoring is essential for many patients!. A much smaller, wearable device is in the works but still years away!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
Moreover, continuous blood sugar monitoring ideally would be better than checking blood sugar only at intervals!. And such monitors could be hooked up to insulin pumps to ensure people get insulin when they need it, 24 hours a day!. But current devices use a thin needle inserted beneath the skin!.
Several companies are competing to bring patients blood sugar monitors that all but eliminate blood letting!. One is the GlucoLight Corp!. Another is OrSense Ltd!. Both reported progress at the American Diabetes Association's 67th Annual Scientific Sessions, held June 22-26 in Chicago!.
The two companies' devices are very different!. The OrSense device uses a finger cuff that periodically restricts blood flow -- much like a blood pressure test -- and then uses a sensor to detect blood-specific signals from infrared light transmitted through the finger!.
A bulky version is already approved for sale in Europe!. And a new model would strap to the wrist like a large watch, with a small wire connecting it to a ring on the index finger!.
The GlucoLight uses a sensor to scan the skin using infrared light!. The sensor is attached to a monitor that, in the current version, is too big to carry around!. It's currently being tested in intensive care wards, where constant blood sugar monitoring is essential for many patients!. A much smaller, wearable device is in the works but still years away!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
It's ok, to check the blood sugar!. But your mother-in-law should ask her doctors about it!. They will teach her how can she do it!. I know a little machine, but every diabetic is different, so ask the doctor!.Www@Answer-Health@Com