Waist to hip ratio - appearance vs statistic?!
Question: Waist to hip ratio - appearance vs statistic!?
Something which confuses me about waist to hip ratio is the appearance of someone's score can contradict how their body shape actually LOOKS!. For example, Cameron Diaz has a lower ratio (0!.64) than Kelly Brook (0!.7) or myself (0!.69), yet Kelly and me have much more defined waists - Cameron has virtually no waist, she looks straight!. I know the flatness of your stomach and how much your butt sticks out count too!. But which is more important - how defined your waist APPEARS or the actual ratio!? Thank you i'm just confused!Www@Answer-Health@Com
Answers:
I doubt Cameron Diaz has a 0!.64 waist/hip ratio because that would be super dramatic curves!. I reckon hers is about 0!.74, which is still good: http://www!.hollywoodcollectibles!.com/aut!.!.!.
My waist/hip ratio is 0!.68, my waist looks small and my hips look wide!.!.!.!.oh and then there is my big butt lol!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
My waist/hip ratio is 0!.68, my waist looks small and my hips look wide!.!.!.!.oh and then there is my big butt lol!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
Statistic!. Numbers are not subjective, appearance is!. It would be hard to figure a ratio for flat butt's and stomachs!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
how defined your waist appears!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
simple thought: beauty is art; not mathWww@Answer-Health@Com