Root canal question....?!
Question: Root canal question!.!.!.!.!?
I had a root canal yesterday and the dentist said I would not need a crown, my mom also had one about 15 years ago and she never needed a crown and the tooth is fine!. Why are there some people that need crowns and some who don't!? What is the difference!?Www@Answer-Health@Com
Answers:
hmm i am a bit confused of your mom's tooth condition
yes the tooth is perhaps fine,, because the procedure of the root canal didnt take out most of the dental structures,, so it doesnt need a crown,, material filling such as composite resin can be satisfying in filling the cavity
all i mean is that it depends on the residual structur of your treated tooth,, if it doesnt need crown,, just have the filling filled it
if it causes wide hole,, the dentist will suggest crown
hope that helps :)Www@Answer-Health@Com
yes the tooth is perhaps fine,, because the procedure of the root canal didnt take out most of the dental structures,, so it doesnt need a crown,, material filling such as composite resin can be satisfying in filling the cavity
all i mean is that it depends on the residual structur of your treated tooth,, if it doesnt need crown,, just have the filling filled it
if it causes wide hole,, the dentist will suggest crown
hope that helps :)Www@Answer-Health@Com
When a tooth has had a root canal it becomes non-vital because the nourishment from the nerve has been removed!. The tooth becomes very brittle!. A crown is always placed on a root canal tooth to prevent fracture!. A tooth can fracture at the gum line and then may need to be surgically extracted!. Your mom should also have her tooth crowned!. Most dentists will not put a crown on tooth of someone under 18!. If under 18 a root canal may have been done on a baby tooth which you will eventually lose!. Each dentist has their own way of doing things!. A different dentist may suggest a crown!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
Most likely enough of the tooth was still in place!. The reason for a crown is to replace the parts of the tooth that are missing after the work is done!. The big issue is the root canal!. Did the dentist use gutta percha to fill the canal!? If he did, you have a problem!. This latex material does not fill the entire canal!. Second, did he use hypochlorite solution to sanitize the canal!? If he did not use a sanitizing laser in the canal to get rid of all the bacteria, you have a problem!. The hypochlorite solution only kills about 30% of the germs!.
A recent study in Europe has shown that 98% of ALL the patients that enter the clinic for BREAST CANCER, the driving force for the cancer was root canals!. If the root canal'd tooth was in the breast meridian pathway, this should be a major concern!. Dentists are not aware of this technology, typically and the typical root canal methods are not good!. Many diseases and problems come from this dental work!.
Cavitations (NICO) happen under the root tip of the canal due to the issues mentioned above!. Cavitations are the deterioration of bone due to infections!. There is no pain involved so most people are not aware they have this issue!. The body's macrophages won't touch these infections due to low blood flow!. As the cavitations fester, capillaries are destroyed and this, in turn, causes less blood flow and more deterioration!. It is important for your health to determine exactly what he did in the root canal work!. I would ask him to tell you exactly what materials he used and how he sanitized the tooth!. Dentists are NOT trained to recognize NICO in dental x-rays!. So, he can't see it in x-rays and you can't feel it due to no pain, so nothing is said or done about these problems in modern dental "standard of care!."
If you have ANY amalgam fillings, you first need to have that garbage removed by a qualified biological dentist!. There are ALWAYS infection under the amalgams and these fillings leach mercury out on a constant basis!.
The California State Board of Dental Examiners, by unanimous vote, approved a two-page document entitled "Dental Materials Fact Sheet!." The purported intent of this document is to encourage discussion between patient and dentist in the selection of denial materials best suited to the patient's dental health, and it will be made available to all licensed dentists in California!. The Board agreed that elemental mercury is a toxic substance, and it acknowledged that research has shown that free mercury can escape from amalgam filling and be absorbed by the body!. The document even states:
Some elements contain in composites have been determined to be cytotoxic and carcinogenic!. It is now required by the state that dentist must give this document to patients or they can lose their license to practice!.
In the early 1800s the National Association of Dental Surgeons actually advocated the elimination of mercury amalgam, but its cheapness kept many dentists using it in spite of its toxicity!. This Association disbanded several decades later, and the precursor to today's American Dental Association (ADA), the National Dental Association, came into being, proclaiming amalgam's safety, although this was just a political statement then, as it is now, For the longest time, it was simply asserted by the ADA that the mercury amalgam (composed of approximately 50% mercury, along with copper, tin, silver and zinc) was a tightly bound chemical complex that would not permit any leakage or release of mercury!. This was proved conclusively wrong by Vimy and Lorscheider in 1985 when they demonstrated that the air inside the mouth with amalgams continually contained elemental mercury vapor, and the dynamic of chewing increased this vapor level substantially!. Further studies have now shown that if you have a crown with a dissimilar metal like gold, for instance, the release of mercury was found to be 80 times faster!
Elemental mercury vapor that emanates from the amalgams is almost completely inhaled, little of it being lost outside of the mouth and body!. Such inhalation allows for a rapid and complete absorption across the alveolar membrane in the lungs!. This mercury easily crosses the blood/brain barrier (the brain and nervous system's natural defense against many toxic substances) subsequently binding very strongly to the sulfur containing proteins of the nervous tissue!. This same affinity for binding sulfur allows its deposit in virtually all of the body's other tissues and organs!. In fact, the much-maligned scapegoat in today's health, cholesterol, appears to actually afford a protective mechanism against the slow and insidious release of mercury into the bloodstream by binding it up and allowing it to be excreted before it gets its grips into any of the body's tissues!. High cholesterol levels may represent just a healthy metabolism doing its best to neutralize the continual release of a toxin!. Patients who undergo amalgam removal consistently show shifts of their cholesterol into or toward the normal range, often within days of such removal!.
Now go to: www!.commons!.ucalgary!.ca/mercury/
This is a study that was done at the University of Calgary School of Medicine on the effects of mercury in brain tissue!. This is a peer reviewed study and verified by the University of Tennessee!. The amount of mercury used in this experiment was 100 to 1,000 times less than what comes out of a single amalgam filling when you brush the filling!
Yet, with all this evidence, the ADA has taken the position that it's o!.k!. to use amalgam fillings!. They are not our friends!. In fact, they are not the dentists friends either!.
Based on available scientific data, the ADA has determined through the adoption of Resolution 42H-1986 that the removal of amalgam restoration from the non-allergic patient for the alleged purpose of removing toxic substances from the body, when such treatment is performed solely at the recommendation or suggestion of the dentist, is improper and unethical!. (emphasis mine)
In other words, the ADA is telling the dentists of America that they don't have the right to counsel their patients regarding the poisonous effects of mercury, unless, of course, they don't mind losing their licenses to practice dentistry!. Patient beware! If you don't believe this, just ask your dentist to tell you the three reasons the ADA will allow them to remove your amalgam fillings and you will be shocked to see what they tell you!. Ask them!.
After CBS-TV ran a 60 Minutes segment on the amalgam issue in December of 1990, the Washington State Dental Association, amazingly, promptly informed its members that their patients did not have a right to know that their "silver fillings" contained mercury!. Moreover, that segment purportedly received the highest viewer response ever, but it's never been repeated, despite the fact that other episodes are frequently rerun!. Is there another unknown agenda here!?
In April, 1994, the Journal of the American Dental Association, in an analysis of a review of the benefits and risks of dental amalgam conducted by the US Public Health Service (USPHS) and published in 1993, made prominent note of the estimated costs for replacement of dental amalgams in the entire country!. It was stated that one-time replacement of all existing amalgams in permanent posterior teeth would cost 248 billion dollars!. It was further pointed out that the increased cost in 1990 had alternative restorative materials been used instead of the amalgams that were placed in the 96 million treated teeth would have been 12!.4 billion dollars!. Money usually talks, and that's a lot of money!. Actually money doesn't just talk, it SCREAMS!. And do you actually think that NO class action law suits would come out of this if the ADA admitted this lunacy has been allowed while the overwhelming evidence is against them!?
You need to realize that so called "modern dentistry" may be modern, but not the high quality of care that you have believed!. It's time to free yourself of the lies you believe!. Educate yourself as to what is good and bad, for your health's sake!.
good luck to us allWww@Answer-Health@Com
A recent study in Europe has shown that 98% of ALL the patients that enter the clinic for BREAST CANCER, the driving force for the cancer was root canals!. If the root canal'd tooth was in the breast meridian pathway, this should be a major concern!. Dentists are not aware of this technology, typically and the typical root canal methods are not good!. Many diseases and problems come from this dental work!.
Cavitations (NICO) happen under the root tip of the canal due to the issues mentioned above!. Cavitations are the deterioration of bone due to infections!. There is no pain involved so most people are not aware they have this issue!. The body's macrophages won't touch these infections due to low blood flow!. As the cavitations fester, capillaries are destroyed and this, in turn, causes less blood flow and more deterioration!. It is important for your health to determine exactly what he did in the root canal work!. I would ask him to tell you exactly what materials he used and how he sanitized the tooth!. Dentists are NOT trained to recognize NICO in dental x-rays!. So, he can't see it in x-rays and you can't feel it due to no pain, so nothing is said or done about these problems in modern dental "standard of care!."
If you have ANY amalgam fillings, you first need to have that garbage removed by a qualified biological dentist!. There are ALWAYS infection under the amalgams and these fillings leach mercury out on a constant basis!.
The California State Board of Dental Examiners, by unanimous vote, approved a two-page document entitled "Dental Materials Fact Sheet!." The purported intent of this document is to encourage discussion between patient and dentist in the selection of denial materials best suited to the patient's dental health, and it will be made available to all licensed dentists in California!. The Board agreed that elemental mercury is a toxic substance, and it acknowledged that research has shown that free mercury can escape from amalgam filling and be absorbed by the body!. The document even states:
Some elements contain in composites have been determined to be cytotoxic and carcinogenic!. It is now required by the state that dentist must give this document to patients or they can lose their license to practice!.
In the early 1800s the National Association of Dental Surgeons actually advocated the elimination of mercury amalgam, but its cheapness kept many dentists using it in spite of its toxicity!. This Association disbanded several decades later, and the precursor to today's American Dental Association (ADA), the National Dental Association, came into being, proclaiming amalgam's safety, although this was just a political statement then, as it is now, For the longest time, it was simply asserted by the ADA that the mercury amalgam (composed of approximately 50% mercury, along with copper, tin, silver and zinc) was a tightly bound chemical complex that would not permit any leakage or release of mercury!. This was proved conclusively wrong by Vimy and Lorscheider in 1985 when they demonstrated that the air inside the mouth with amalgams continually contained elemental mercury vapor, and the dynamic of chewing increased this vapor level substantially!. Further studies have now shown that if you have a crown with a dissimilar metal like gold, for instance, the release of mercury was found to be 80 times faster!
Elemental mercury vapor that emanates from the amalgams is almost completely inhaled, little of it being lost outside of the mouth and body!. Such inhalation allows for a rapid and complete absorption across the alveolar membrane in the lungs!. This mercury easily crosses the blood/brain barrier (the brain and nervous system's natural defense against many toxic substances) subsequently binding very strongly to the sulfur containing proteins of the nervous tissue!. This same affinity for binding sulfur allows its deposit in virtually all of the body's other tissues and organs!. In fact, the much-maligned scapegoat in today's health, cholesterol, appears to actually afford a protective mechanism against the slow and insidious release of mercury into the bloodstream by binding it up and allowing it to be excreted before it gets its grips into any of the body's tissues!. High cholesterol levels may represent just a healthy metabolism doing its best to neutralize the continual release of a toxin!. Patients who undergo amalgam removal consistently show shifts of their cholesterol into or toward the normal range, often within days of such removal!.
Now go to: www!.commons!.ucalgary!.ca/mercury/
This is a study that was done at the University of Calgary School of Medicine on the effects of mercury in brain tissue!. This is a peer reviewed study and verified by the University of Tennessee!. The amount of mercury used in this experiment was 100 to 1,000 times less than what comes out of a single amalgam filling when you brush the filling!
Yet, with all this evidence, the ADA has taken the position that it's o!.k!. to use amalgam fillings!. They are not our friends!. In fact, they are not the dentists friends either!.
Based on available scientific data, the ADA has determined through the adoption of Resolution 42H-1986 that the removal of amalgam restoration from the non-allergic patient for the alleged purpose of removing toxic substances from the body, when such treatment is performed solely at the recommendation or suggestion of the dentist, is improper and unethical!. (emphasis mine)
In other words, the ADA is telling the dentists of America that they don't have the right to counsel their patients regarding the poisonous effects of mercury, unless, of course, they don't mind losing their licenses to practice dentistry!. Patient beware! If you don't believe this, just ask your dentist to tell you the three reasons the ADA will allow them to remove your amalgam fillings and you will be shocked to see what they tell you!. Ask them!.
After CBS-TV ran a 60 Minutes segment on the amalgam issue in December of 1990, the Washington State Dental Association, amazingly, promptly informed its members that their patients did not have a right to know that their "silver fillings" contained mercury!. Moreover, that segment purportedly received the highest viewer response ever, but it's never been repeated, despite the fact that other episodes are frequently rerun!. Is there another unknown agenda here!?
In April, 1994, the Journal of the American Dental Association, in an analysis of a review of the benefits and risks of dental amalgam conducted by the US Public Health Service (USPHS) and published in 1993, made prominent note of the estimated costs for replacement of dental amalgams in the entire country!. It was stated that one-time replacement of all existing amalgams in permanent posterior teeth would cost 248 billion dollars!. It was further pointed out that the increased cost in 1990 had alternative restorative materials been used instead of the amalgams that were placed in the 96 million treated teeth would have been 12!.4 billion dollars!. Money usually talks, and that's a lot of money!. Actually money doesn't just talk, it SCREAMS!. And do you actually think that NO class action law suits would come out of this if the ADA admitted this lunacy has been allowed while the overwhelming evidence is against them!?
You need to realize that so called "modern dentistry" may be modern, but not the high quality of care that you have believed!. It's time to free yourself of the lies you believe!. Educate yourself as to what is good and bad, for your health's sake!.
good luck to us allWww@Answer-Health@Com