Should our country have university health care? Or should people pay for there o!


Question: Should our country have university health care!? Or should people pay for there own healthcare!?
Or should the governement have a plan for people who cannot afford health and every one who does not went should pay for a better health care plan!?

This to me is a very tough call!. I believe that everyone should have a right to have health care including people who are very poor!. I think University Heathcare would be good and bad!. Its good because every one would be covered!. But the downside to it is if you get sick you will have to wait on a waiting list!. And some people who is on the waiting list may die because they are not being waited on yet!.

I say that the governmnet cames up for somekind of plan where they help out the poor and who else that does want the governemnt healthcare problem!.

But for the other people who do not like it then they should get ask their employer what kind of plans they are offering!. Or they should buy it them selfs if the went a better quality healthcare plan!.

As I said this is a very tough issue!. any ideas!?Www@Answer-Health@Com


Answers:
Hands down best solution is the one presented here:
QUALITY, ACCESSIBLE, AFFORDABLE health care for all!.
That means preventative care (physical with follow up)!. Real medication (no Medicare "donut holes" the really ill are ripped off again!.) No bogus ridiculously low "caps" on needed medical procedures!. No abuse of the ER!. No paying for the silly with the sniffles to go to the doc for free!. No more bankruptcies over medical bills!. I want THIS plan that ends abuse of the taxpayer, takes the burden off employers, provides price transparency, and ends the rip-off of the US taxpayer at the hands of greedy insurance CEOs (which has been repeatedly documented)!.
http://www!.booklocker!.com/books/3068!.htm!.!.!.
Read the PDF, not the blurb, for the bulk of the plan!. Book is searchable on Amazon!.com
Cassandra Nathan's Save America, Save the World

Nathan addresses all the REAL problems with health care now, including our stupidity in denying THOUSANDS of well-qualified students the opportunity to become physicians, nurses, etc!. to deal with the CHRONIC and world-wide shortage of these workers, which helps drive health care costs up and fills waiting lists even NOW throughout much of the US!.
For those who are healthy, they do NOT know that the typical wait time for a specialist is over a month in MANY places in the US--and that's with insurance and a decent-sized population!. You can forget about choices, etc!. if you're in a very small area in the US!. You probably can't afford a specialist without insurance!.
Also we are going to lose a substantial number of these practitioners SOON as many want to retire in 5-10 years and we put so few grads out we won't be replacing them really, let alone dealing with the shortage!.

Nathan's plan is the most compassionate, logical, cost-efficient offering!. It completely resolves the problem of the uninsured, ends medical bankruptcies, and increases CHOICE for doctors and patients!. It's voluntary, free-market, NO increased taxes on people, no employer mandate, etc!.

UHC does NOT work!. Read Canadian Doc on it:
http://www!.city-journal!.org/html/17_3_ca!.!.!.

The much lauded French system raises some questions as well!. From their Embassy site (ambafrance-us!.org) they state that 96 percent of the population receives free or 100 percent reimbursed health care!. They state the system is part of their Social Security and is funded from worker



The consumer health information on answer-health.com is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment for any medical conditions.
The answer content post by the user, if contains the copyright content please contact us, we will immediately remove it.
Copyright © 2007-2011 answer-health.com -   Terms of Use -   Contact us

Health Categories