What do you think about a rule where as soon as females enter high school they a!
Question: What do you think about a rule where as soon as females enter high school they are given an IUD!.!.!.!?
Which will keep them from getting pregnant for 5 years!.
So that would be ages 15-20!. I personally think 20 is still too young BUT at least they would not be having kids until the age of 20!.
What do you think of that rule!?Www@Answer-Health@Com
So that would be ages 15-20!. I personally think 20 is still too young BUT at least they would not be having kids until the age of 20!.
What do you think of that rule!?Www@Answer-Health@Com
Answers:
Less teen pregnancy would be good, but it that would not be a good solution!. For one thing it violates women's rights!. Also it's too dangerous!. Women with IUD's should really only have one sexual partner who has been tested for STI's!. Having a string in your vagina that leads up to the uterus is dangerous if you get an infection!. Girls in high school, especially if they knew they couldn't get pregnant, would have multiple partners and could get Chlamydia and not have any symptoms and then they'd end up with PID and could lose the ability to ever have kids!.
So no!.!.!.that is a bad idea!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
So no!.!.!.that is a bad idea!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
Birth Control is still new on the market, and doesnt always work, if you get pregnant while your on birth control your kid could get messed up, plus if that was a rule and some girls refused it [because you are allowed to refuse drugs for your own health] Then guys would assume they still had it and try to get in their pants anyway!. Sometimes after birth control a girl is left unable to give birth, and thats all some girls wanna do is get older and raise a family!. Plus I know some mothers who are 17 and better caregivers then mothers I know at 40!. If there were to be a rule it would have to be like, Get tubes tied when your young, then fill out an application that proves you would be a suitable parent and get tested for drugs and stuff before they put your tubes back!. Of course rules like these would lead to increased rapes [the predator wouldnt worry about a baby and dna and stuff] and prostetution, [because women wouldnt be scared of having kids] and horrible stuff like that!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
No, that is sexist and lame!.!.!. how can you assume all teens will have sex, what if that violates someones religion!. or beliefs!. And women are not required to have a pap until they begin having sex, and they are too young to be forced to have something shoved up there at 15!.!. And that isnt even the best form of birth control in my opinion!. and the different varieties of birth control are all equal and only different by the form you prefer, and IUD, an arm implant, the pill, a nuvoring, a patch, a shot, condoms!.!.!. You get it all free!! at Planned Parent Hood!. It is their choice to use birth control or not!. Though they should be educated better, but schools feel that most of the topics are "inappropriate" but most teens are under educated on sexual education, and sexually transmitted diseases!. And parents are often to embarrassed to tell teens about sex!. Its up to parents to educate their children on sexual education! Not up to the government to implement a "chastity belt" for all teens!. What if she chooses to have a child!. you would be taking away their rights as humans!. That is NOT RIGHT!Www@Answer-Health@Com
Umm no, girls that start highschool most of them dont even get a pap yet!.
Koodos for thinging positivly tho :) But it would be an invasion on their entire world!. the rule still stands if your old enough to have sex, your old enough to accept the consequences!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
Koodos for thinging positivly tho :) But it would be an invasion on their entire world!. the rule still stands if your old enough to have sex, your old enough to accept the consequences!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
Very stupid!, iud's are recommended for wemon that already have kids, and have one sex partner,because of the risk of pelvic inflamatory disease!. anywayz so that would be dumbWww@Answer-Health@Com
no, i think that is a violation of human rights
it is a childs desition of having sex or not!.!.!. and if teens knew they could have sex without being pregnant!.!. then more would be doing itWww@Answer-Health@Com
it is a childs desition of having sex or not!.!.!. and if teens knew they could have sex without being pregnant!.!. then more would be doing itWww@Answer-Health@Com
i think that is an amazing idea!. it would be great if it would happen but it couldn't happen because it is violation of privacyWww@Answer-Health@Com
IUD's!.!.!.no!.
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease is a major issue!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease is a major issue!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
it could be a good idea but it will never happen!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
i think that would do more harm than good =(
if u want it then get it!.Www@Answer-Health@Com
if u want it then get it!.Www@Answer-Health@Com