WOMENS HEALTH POLL: What is your preference?!


Question: WOMENS HEALTH POLL: What is your preference?
I have a question for all of you ladies here. Do you prefer a man who is circumcised or uncircumcised? And Why?

Answers:

I prefer uncircumcised because it allows for more sexual variation, it's easier to give hand jobs, and because the foreskin glides and reduces unwanted friction during sex. It also keeps the glans of the penis from 'scooping' out a woman's natural moisture with its edge durig intercourse.
A foreskin is not 'extra' skin, it actually has some functions that are kind of nice for a woman.

Circumcised men tend to get a little less sensitive, because the glans is always bare; the skin gets just that much thicker. Plus, the foreskin itself has lots of nerve endings... which are cut away when it's cut off. Which is a great waste.
Less sensitivity means that the man will often need to thrust harder/deeper in order to get enough stimulation and that's not always pleasurable for a woman. After all, most of the nerve endings in the vagina are near the entrance, not in the back.

Yay for foreskins! :-)

http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/



The concept of a preference for a man that has lost part of his penis and capacity for pleasure via circumcision is really outrageous. If it is a matter of looks (even though they look about the same erect) or the hygiene myth (a cut up penis is no cleaner than a natural one), that is trivial compared to a human having the chance to experience the pleasures and sexual function that these parts provide

IMO, some women may say that a cut penis looks better when that is what they have seen more of. However, another factor is that a flaccid cut penis looks like a not big erect penis. It was for this reason that the Greeks would not let men be in the Olympics if the were cut. It looked obscene. Could it be that some women like the look of cut because it is more like the state that women would normally see a natural penis (i.e., erect)?

Circumcision is a weird thing a cutting off of erogenous tissue. The long term harm is huge with nerve damage and harm to the sensory system. A whole range of sensation and sexual and protective function are lost. The lips and fingertips have similar touch sense. To take this away from another person without their consent is heinous.

Most of the worlds men are natural. That allows people to have natural sex, the way we evolved to have it. Circumcision is a weird thing -- a cutting off of the main male pleasure zones. This is tons of pleasure giving nerves, blood vessels, protective covering and pleasure zones. The dynamics and function of the penis is changed for good. A woman that says she likes cut men is no better than a man that says he likes cut women (circumcised women typically have had their clitoral hood and labia cut off). This is serious genital modification (mutilation) of the male with more nerves cut than female circumcision. It does lead men to want oral and anal more, because vaginal sex is less satisfying after the cut of these parts. Cut men have more premature ejaculation issues as the scar is now the most sensitive part and they have lost control of orgasm timing. It leads to sexual dysfunction at a young age. The cut men in thr world use most of the VIAGRA consumed.



Well, erm, I'm only 13, but I think being circumcised is a little, if not a lot, weird.. why would you have it cut off? eew

but that's just my opinion haha :)



uncircumcised. Circ looks kind of.... odd,



I dont think it feels much different.




The consumer health information on answer-health.com is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment for any medical conditions.
The answer content post by the user, if contains the copyright content please contact us, we will immediately remove it.
Copyright © 2007-2011 answer-health.com -   Terms of Use -   Contact us

Health Categories