Compared to uncircumcized men, do circumcized men lgenerally last longer during !
Question: Becasue foreskin is very sensitive to stimulation ???
Answers: Becasue foreskin is very sensitive to stimulation ???
Studies have shown little difference, some showing cut guys lasting a few seconds longer, others showing uncut guys lasting a few seconds longer. But those are averages. Other studies show that cut men are more likely to suffer from premature ejaculation (PE). But they are also more likely to experience delayed ejaculation or failure to ejaculate at all. The long times reported by guys who could not ejaculate when they wanted to made up for the short times reported by the men with PE, making the averages about the same. Uncut men are more likely to be able to ejaculate when they want to, but not before they want to.
yes...sometimes, because when the foreskin is removed the constant rubbing of the head against boxers/pants etc. killls some nerve endings desensitizing your penis. so uncut guys have more fun ;)
I would have to agree with you.
The links attached should provide sufficient information/studies for you.
The main concern I have is if you are looking to be circumcised (UK spelling has an s not z!) in order to extend your sexual activities.
A study showed they actually only last on average 10 seconds more, so I would say no. Yes they lose sensitivity becuase they have no foreskin and their glans is less sensitivity, but they thrust differently to get off which makes up for it.
Amazing that the actual data say that the time for Orgasm for uncut vers cut is only 30 seconds longer! I was circumcised at 18 and I know sex is better circumcised! There is no doubt in my mind it's the way to be and both my boys (1&3) were circumcised at birth!
maybe a little but bit it's not a good thing because the O'Hara study showed they get their pleasure differently